Campaign to Stop Sand and Gravel Extraction at Barford and Wasperton

What’s happened to date – including Key Documents and Reports

From October 2015 to August 2018

OCTOBER 2015. First Consultation

Warwickshire County Council (WCC) issued notification of their intention to include Wasperton Farm (Site 4) and Glebe Farm (Site 5) in WCC Local Minerals Plan. The Community were notified and village meetings were organised by Parish Councils. WCC planners attended to outline the proposals and answer questions from the community.

The Community rallied to respond by end of January 2016. There were 210 respondents for site 4 and 158 for site 5. A community member’s response guided by first professional opinion (Keith Williams – Stansgate Consultants)

OCTOBER 2016. Cabinet Meeting

WCC planners presented to Cabinet, proposed to move the plan forward with a reduction in size for Site 4 (now with 350 metres adjacent to Sandy Way removed) to the next stage of the process.

DECEMBER 2016 – FEBRUARY 2017 Second Consultation

This consultation could only consider the Soundness and Legality of the plan and had to be completed within very specific parameters. A Community meeting was held to provide information and included talks by specialists and a How To complete the Form 20 required by WCC.

Wardell Armstrong advised community members on how to respond to consultation WA also sought advice from specialist, Jam Consulting to appraise the counties Sustainability Appraisal. Additional Professional report by Fisher German commissioned and submitted as part of the consultation.

There were 135 Responses for site 4, and 115 for site 5.

After this consultation a group of residents gathered to meet with representative from Wardell Armstrong, Stephen Stoney. It was agreed that we needed to commence a fundraising campaign to build a fund with which to pay for professional advice.

Community members agreed to instruct Wardell Armstrong to advise and guide the community on how to proceed in order to be prepared for the next phase. It was just after this that the Sand and Gravel Action Group was formed.

Wardell Armstrong advised seeking guidance from Barrister specialising in Minerals. A Brief to Advise was prepared by Wardell Armstrong in advance of meeting with Richard Kimblin of No.5 Chambers, attended by members of the committee.

Barrister’s recommendation was to focus on Heritage and Landscape as these are the key areas followed by ‘Best and Most Versatile’ Land and the Sustainability Appraisal. Due to WCC not having sufficiently investigated these areas the barrister advised strongly for us to obtain specialist Reports covering Heritage and Landscape. These reports were commissioned and submitted to WCC planning department and meetings were held and reports presented to Leader of WCC, the Portfolio Holder and County Councillors.

Community meetings and events (e.g. the very successful Promise Auction) have been held to raise the awareness of the campaign, to inform residents, gain support and financial contribution to oppose the inclusion of Sites 4 and 5 in the plan.

OCTOBER 17 Cabinet Meeting

Just prior to this meeting WCC planning department advised that as they were a further year on, they had re-calculated the amount of Sand and Gravel required and were now reducing the overall amount from 8.5 million tonnes to 6.5 million tonnes. A reduction of almost 2m tonnes.

Community members selected specific topics on which to present at cabinet.

The result of this new proposal, although good news in general, was another 9-month delay.

We had EVERYTHING to fight for. The committee engaged the services of a campaign consultant from Green Balance. The advice here was to analyse the situation with regard to inert fill

It was also recommended that Hedgerow and Ecology reports be commissioned in order to support arguments in the Landscape Report for Site 4 and to demonstrate the difficulty and unviability of working the site. Ecology plus Hydrology (Thelsford Brook) for Site 5 were conducted for the same reasons but also as a means to demonstrate a lesser tonnage available to that of the proposer (WCC)

Again, these reports were submitted to WCC planners and Officers to be considered in their site selection.

JULY 2018

WCC planning Department released the documents for the revised plan which showed that Site 5 Glebe Farm and Site 7 Salford Priors had been withdrawn from the plan in order to reduce tonnage. An additional 0.985 m tonnes had been left in the plan in order to cover any shortfalls during the plan period.

WCC Cabinet meeting 24th July Documents

Cabinet Meeting July 2018

Yet again members of the community presented key issues of opposition to the members of the Cabinet. However, the Cabinet moved the plan on to be presented to the Full Council two days later. The decision here was that the plan be prepared to go out to yet another consultation where members of the public are able to comment on the soundness and legality of the plan on a form either the same as or similar to the Form 20 used in December 16 – February 17 consultation.

Financial Facts to date

 This spreadsheet itemises the monies we have raised since early 2017 until the end of August 2018. It also details how the money has been spent and to whom it has been paid.


October 2015 – August 2018

Presentation to Community August 2017 

Brief to advise – Wardell Armstrong for  Richard Kimblin

Fisher German Report Jan 2017

Flyer 2015

Heritage Statement  Sites 4&5 – Wardell Armstrong

JAM comments on Sustainability Appraisal

Landscape Report Sites 4&5 – Wardell Armstrong

Presentation to community, 2nd Consultation

Community Members Response – 1st Consultation

Community Members Response – 2nd Consultation

Green Balance Advise

Ecology Report – Site 4

Hedgerow Regulations Assessment

Presentations to Cabinet Oct 2017

Presentations to Cabinet July 2018

Financial Status to date